Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Advances in Dental Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stephen, K.W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stephen, K.W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
Adv Dent Res 9:127-128, July, 1995
© 1995 SAGE Publications

The Value of Anti-Caries and Anti-Plaque Dentifrices at a Community Level

K.W. Stephen

Department of Adult Dental Care University of Glasgow Dental School 378 Sauchiehall Street Glasgow, G2 3JZ, Scotland

Although dentifrices (in a modem sense) were first introduced at the turn of the century, it was not until the advent of fluoride-containing compounds that any of therapeutic value was produced. In the early post-war years, formulation compatibility difficulties occurred, with the result that none was demonstrated to have clinically proven efficacy until stannous fluoride was successfully incorporated in the "Crest" formulation of 1955. Thereafter, sodium monofluorophosphate (SMFP) appeared, to be followed by organic and acid-phosphate fluoride preparations, most of which were shown to produce clinical benefit over placebo controls. Since the late 1970's, however, such studies have been deemed unethical in many countries in view of the almost universal availability of efficacious fluoride dentifrices. While an NaF formulation was the first to be tested (albeit unsuccessfully) by Bibby (1945), there was a considerable time period before the arrival of both stable and effective silica-based systems in the early 1980's. Results of studies have varied, but the largest ever double-blind NaF/SMFP head-to-head dentifrice trial yet published (Stephen et al., 1994) has indicated a 6.4% significant benefit in favor of NaF (in silica) over SMFP. With respect to the effect of dentifrice fluoride levels, above 1000 ppm dose-response caries reductions have been obtained, but the efficacy of preparations containing 500 ppm F or less has yet to be demonstrated. In relation to root caries, Jensen and Kohout (1988) reported a 41.4% DFS significant reduction in subjects who used a NaF/silica dentifrice at 1100 ppm F, over a one-year period.

Key Words: Dentifrice • clinical trials • caries • plaque.

Advances in Dental Research, Vol. 9, No. 2, 127-128 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/08959374950090021001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?