This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Adams, D. Articles by Addy, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Adams, D. Articles by Addy, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Compound via MeSH Substance via MeSH Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Mouthrinses

Department of Basic Dental Science Dental School Cardiff CF4 4XY Wales, UK

M. Addy

'Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontology Dental Hospital and School Lower Maudlin Street Bristol BSI 21Y, UK

Mouthrinses have been used for centuries for medicinal and cosmetic purposes, but it is only in recent years that the rationale behind the use of the ingredients has been subject to scientific research and clinical trials. Although Listerine held its position formany years in the vanguard of the anti-plaque agents, the advent of mouthrinses containing chlorhexidine was a major breakthrough in the research for a chemical means to prevent disease. Since that time, and especially in the past ten years, the number of formulations that claim to have anti-plaque, anti-calculus, and anti-caries activity has increased, and much emphasis has been placed on such substances as an adjunct to, or indeed to replace, conventional toothbrushing techniques.

This review covers the literature on mouthrinses over the past five years, concentrating more on the anti-plaque, anti-gingivitis, and anti-calculus formulations. In the first section, the methods of conducting clinical trials of mouthrinses are discussed, and a plea is made for a greater degree of standardization of methodology with agreed acceptable levels of clinical benefit. Trials of established mouthrinses are considered, and the advantages and disadvantages of several newer formulations discussed.

From the review, it appears that chlorhexidine has no equal in its effects on reduction of plaque and gingivitis, but major drawbacks lie in the taste and stain-producing problems. The pre-brushing rinse, Plax, does not have unqualified success in all trials, though the more recent European formulation may have promise. Newer rinses which inhibit bacterial adhesion to tooth surfaces also appear promising, and it is suggested that more work on combinations of active ingredients is necessary.

Advances in Dental Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, 291-301 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/08959374940080022401


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. S. Sona, J. E. Zack, M. E. Schallom, M. McSweeney, K. McMullen, J. Thomas, C. M. Coopersmith, W. A. Boyle, T. G. Buchman, J. E. Mazuski, et al. The Impact of a Simple, Low-cost Oral Care Protocol on Ventilator-associated Pneumonia Rates in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 2009; 24(1): 54 - 62. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A.S. Landa, H.C. Van Der Mei, and H.J. Busscher Detachment of Linking Film Bacteria From Enamel Surfaces by Oral Rinses and Penetration of Sodium Lauryl Sulphate Through an Artificial Oral Biofilm Advances in Dental Research, November 1, 1997; 11(4): 528 - 538. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Adams Calculus-Inhibition Agents: a Review of Recent Clinical Trials Advances in Dental Research, December 1, 1995; 9(4): 410 - 418. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N.W. Johnson and M.A. Curtis Preventive Therapy for Periodontal Diseases Advances in Dental Research, July 1, 1994; 8(2): 337 - 348. [Abstract] [PDF]