This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rudney, J.D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rudney, J.D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Saliva and Dental Plaque

'Department of Oral Science, School of Dentistry, University of Minnesota, 17-252 Moos Tower, 515 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA, jrudney{at}tc.umn.edu

Dental plaque is being redefined as oral biofilm. Diverse overlapping microbial consortia are present on all oral tissues. Biofilms are structured, displaying features like channels and projections. Constituent species switch back and forth between sessile and planktonic phases. Saliva is the medium for planktonic suspension. Several major functions can be defined for saliva in relation to oral biofilm. It serves as a medium for transporting planktonic bacteria within and between mouths. Bacteria in transit may be vulnerable to negative selection. Salivary agglutinins may prevent reattachment to surfaces. Killing by antimicrobial proteins may lead to attachment of dead cells. Salivary proteins form conditioning films on all oral surfaces. This contributes to positive selection for microbial adherence. Saliva carries chemical messengers which allow live adherent cells to sense a critical density of conspecifics. Growth begins, and thick biofilms may become resistant to antimicrobial substances. Salivary macromolecules may be catabolized, but salivary flow also may clear dietary substrates. Salivary proteins act in ways that benefit both host and microbe. All have multiple functions, and many do the same job. They form heterotypic complexes, which may exist in large micelle-like structures. These issues make it useful to compare subjects whose saliva functions differently. We have developed a simultaneous assay for aggregation, killing, live adherence, and dead adherence of oral species. Screening of 149 subjects has defined high killing/low adherence, low killing/high adherence, high killing/high adherence, and low killing/low adherence groups. These will be evaluated for differences in their flora.

Key Words: Saliva • dental plaque • biofilm • bacterial aggregation • antimicrobial proteins • bacterial adherence.

Advances in Dental Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, 29-39 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/08959374000140010401


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K.-P. Leung, J.J. Abercrombie, T.M. Campbell, K.D. Gilmore, C.A. Bell, J.A. Faraj, and P.P. DeLuca Antimicrobial Peptides for Plaque Control Advances in Dental Research, August 1, 2009; 21(1): 57 - 62. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Chaudhuri, S. Paju, E. M. Haase, M. M. Vickerman, J. M. Tanzer, and F. A. Scannapieco Amylase-Binding Protein B of Streptococcus gordonii Is an Extracellular Dipeptidyl-Peptidase Infect. Immun., October 1, 2008; 76(10): 4530 - 4537. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.M. Smoot, J.C. Smoot, H. Smidt, P.A. Noble, M. Konneke, Z.A. McMurry, and D.A. Stahl DNA Microarrays as Salivary Diagnostic Tools for Characterizing the Oral Cavity's Microbial Community Advances in Dental Research, June 1, 2005; 18(1): 6 - 11. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Paddick, S. R. Brailsford, E. A. M. Kidd, and D. Beighton Phenotypic and Genotypic Selection of Microbiota Surviving under Dental Restorations Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 1, 2005; 71(5): 2467 - 2472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]